Abstract Introduction Intussusceptions in adults are rare, representing 1% to 5% of intestinal obstructions in this age group. This condition can be caused by benign and malignant lesions acting as lead points, the latter being the most frequent. Furthermore, the diagnosis is challenging due to the non-specific symptoms with variable duration. Case Presentation A 43-year-old man, with a history of localized clear-cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) treated 9 years earlier with a right radical nephrectomy, presented with bowel obstruction symptoms. An abdominal computed tomography scan showed an ileocolonic intussusception. Hence, the patient required a right hemicolectomy with ileotransverse anastomosis. The histopathological analysis showed a metastatic ccRC to the terminal ileum causing the intussusception. Discussion Adult intussusceptions are rare. However, they should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with abdominal pain and symptoms of bowel obstruction. Metastases of renal cancer to the small bowel are uncommon and even more so in the form of intussusception. Definitive treatment must be tailored to the patient's condition and underlying cause.

ABSTRACT Background: Muscle mass and visceral fat may be assessed at the level of the third lumbar vertebra (L3) in computed tomography (CT). Both variables have been related with adverse surgical outcomes. Objective: The objective of the study was to study the association of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and visceral fat area (VFA) with 30-day mortality in colorectal surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary referral hospital in Mexico City. Patients who underwent colorectal surgery with primary anastomosis from January 2007 to December 2018 were included in the study. Their pre-operative CT scans were analyzed with the NIH ImageJ software at the level of the third lumbar vertebra to determine their SMI (L3-SMI) and the VFA. Logistic regression analysis (adjusted by surgery anatomical location) was used to determine the association between these variables and surgical 30-day mortality. Results: A total of 548 patients were included; 30-day mortality was 4.18% (23 patients). On univariable analysis, L3-SMI, low SMI, anastomosis leak, pre-operative albumin, estimated blood loss, age, steroid use, Charlson comorbidity index score >2, and type of surgery were associated with 30-day mortality. On multivariable analysis, low SMI remained an independent risk factor with an odds ratio of 4.74, 95% confidence interval 1.22-18.36 (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Low SMI was found to be an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality in patients submitted to colorectal surgery with a primary anastomosis, whether for benign or malignant diagnosis. VFA was not associated with 30-day mortality.

Abstract Antecedentes: El diagnóstico de cáncer colorrectal (CCR) en el contexto de urgencia está asociado a un mal pronóstico. Objetivo: Determinar los factores sociodemográficos asociados a cirugía de urgencia en el CCR en nuestra institución Método: De enero de 2009 a diciembre de 2017 se incluyeron los pacientes operados de CCR y se realizaron análisis univariado y multivariado para determinar los potenciales factores de riesgo. Resultados: Se incluyeron en el estudio 247 pacientes operados de CCR. El 7.7% de las cirugías fueron de urgencia. En el análisis univariado, los pacientes sin antecedentes familiares de cáncer (odds ratio [OR]: 4.95), los habitantes de zonas rurales (OR: 3.7) y aquellos en etapas avanzadas del cáncer (OR: 5.06) se asociaron a cirugía de urgencia. Los pacientes con nivel socioeconómico medio tuvieron menos probabilidad de que su cirugía fuera de urgencia (OR: 0.14; p = 0.003). En el análisis multivariado, debutar con una etapa clínica avanzada (OR: 4.41; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC95%]: 1.21-16.05; p = 0.024) y tener un nivel socioeconómico medio (OR: 0.41; IC95%: 0.04-0.55; p = 0.004) fueron factores independientes para cirugía de urgencia por CCR. Conclusiones: Los factores sociales, económicos y demográficos se encontraron relacionados con la necesidad de cirugía de urgencia por CCR.

Background: Diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) after emergency presentation is associated with a worse prognosis. Aim: The aim of the study was to determine the sociodemographic factors related with emergency CRC surgery at our institution. Methods: From January 2009 to December 2017, patients that underwent CRC surgery at our institution were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine the effect of the potential risk factors on the rate of emergency surgery. Results: A total of 247 patients underwent CRC surgery at our institution. The rate of emergency surgery was 7.7%. On univariate analysis, patients without a family history of cancer (odds ratio [OR]: 4.95), living in a rural area (OR: 3.7), and late clinical cancer stage (OR: 5.06) were associated with emergent surgery. Mid-income status was a protective factor for emergency surgery (OR: 0.14, p = 0.003). On multivariate analysis, late clinical cancer stage (OR: 4.41, 95% CI 1.21-16.05, p = 0.024) and mid-income economic status (OR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.04-0.55, p = 0.004) were identified as independent risk factors for emergency surgery. Conclusion: Social, economic, and demographic factors were identified as predictors for emergent CRC surgery.

Abstract Colonic lipomas are infrequent, benign, non-epithelial, fatty neoplasms. Most of the colonic lipomas are asymptomatic, but around 25% of patients may develop symptoms. Nowadays, surgical resection of the involved segment is the treatment of choice. We report three cases of colonic intussusceptions caused by colonic lipomas in adult patients. The patients underwent surgical resection, and the diagnosis was confirmed by histopathological examination of the specimens.

Resumen Los lipomas colónicos son neoplasias benignas, adiposas, no epiteliales poco frecuentes. La mayoría de los lipomas de colon son asintomáticos, pero alrededor del 25% de los pacientes pueden desarrollar síntomas. En la actualidad, la resección quirúrgica del segmento afectado es el tratamiento de elección. Presentamos tres casos de intususcepción intestinal secundaria a lipomas colónicos en pacientes adultos. Los pacientes fueron sometidos a resección quirúrgica y el diagnóstico se confirmó mediante examen histopatológico.

ABSTRACT Background: Despite the advantages of diverting loop ileostomy construction, it is related to complications. Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the risk factors for complications after loop ileostomy closure. Methods: Patients who underwent loop ileostomy closure from January 2010 to March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the effect of the potential risk factors on the rate of each complication. Results: A total of 136 patients underwent reversal. Indications for the initial operation were colorectal cancer (39.7%), diverticulitis (25.7%), idiopathic chronic ulcerative colitis (ICUC) (8.1%), familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) (7.4%), and others (19.1%). Multivariate analysis identified the following risk factors: type of incision (midline laparotomy) (odds ratio [OR] = 6.5) for wound infection; treatment with immunomodulator (OR = 12.5) for anastomotic leak; history of FAP (OR = 9.8) for intestinal obstruction; previous use of immunomodulator (OR = 10.0) and performing reversal through midline incision (OR = 18.9) for reoperation; and ≥ 65 years old (OR = 3.5) for medical complications. The rate of incisional hernia was 11%, and the risk factors were time to closure < 3 months (OR = 6.4) and parastomal hernia (OR = 13.2). Conclusions: Several patient-related and surgical technique factors should be considered at the time of loop ileostomy closure to reduce post-operative morbidity.

Resumen Antecedentes: A pesar de las ventajas de la ileostomía en asa de derivación, múltiples complicaciones se han asociado a su uso. Objetivo: Determinar los factores de riesgo para presentar complicaciones tras el cierre de una ileostomía en asa. Método: Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo de los pacientes sometidos a cierre de ileostomía en asa de enero de 2010 a marzo de 2018. Se determinaron los factores de riesgo utilizando regresión multivariable. Resultados: Se incluyeron 136 pacientes. Las indicaciones para cirugía fueron cáncer colorrectal (39.7%), diverticulitis (25.7%), colitis ulcerosa crónica idiopática (CUCI) (8.1%), poliposis adenomatosa familiar (PAF) (7.4%) y otras (19.1%). Se identificaron los siguientes factores de riesgo: incisión en línea media (OR: 6.5) para infección de herida; tratamiento inmunomodulador (OR: 12.5) para fuga de anastomosis; antecedente de PAF (OR: 9.8) para oclusión intestinal; tratamiento inmunomodulador (OR: 10) e incisión en línea media (OR: 18.9) para reintervención; y edad ≥ 65 años (OR: 3.5) para complicaciones médicas. La frecuencia de hernia incisional fue del 11%: < 3 meses para el cierre (OR: 6.4) y hernia parastomal (OR: 13.2). Conclusiones: Numerosos factores relacionados con el paciente y con la técnica quirúrgica deben de ser considerados al momento del cierre de la ileostomía en asa para reducir la morbilidad posoperatoria.

RESUMO Introdução: O objetivo de nosso estudo foi descrever os resultados cirúrgicos do procedimento de Deloyer em nosso centro de referência e comparar os resultados de pacientes com e sem ileostomia de proteção. Métodos: Pacientes submetidos ao procedimento de Deloyer de 2013 a 2016 foram incluídos prospectivamente. Foram analisadas as características gerais, as variáveis intraoperatórias, o curso pós-operatório e os desfechos funcionais. Os pacientes foram comparados em dois grupos: Grupo 1) pacientes submetidos ao procedimento de Deloyer (PD) sem ileostomia, e grupo 2) procedimento de Deloyer com ileostomia de proteção (IP). Resultados: Foram incluídos 16 pacientes submetidos à transposição isoperistáltica da porção remanescente do cólon direito, dos quais 9 (63%) eram do sexo masculino com idade média de 47 anos (variação de 22-76) anos. A principal indicação cirúrgica foi a restauração do trânsito intestinal (62,5%). Houve maior morbidade maior no grupo IP, mas sem significância estatística (20% vs. 9%, p = 0,92). Nenhum vazamento ou óbito foi relatado. A duração da hospitalização foi de 7 dias. O número médio de evacuações por dia foi 4, aos 18 meses de seguimento. Apenas quatro (25%) pacientes utilizaram irregularmente a loperamida. Conclusões: O procedimento de Deloyer tem resultados satisfatórios e é reprodutível com baixa morbidade. As taxas de morbidades maiores e menores foram semelhantes entre os grupos, sugerindo que os custos e riscos de um segundo procedimento podem ser evitados proporcionando-se uma anastomose primária segura.

ABSTRACT Introduction: The objective of our study was to describe surgical outcomes of Deloyers procedure in our referral center, and to compare the results of patients with and without protective ileostomy. Methods: Patients undergoing a Deloyers procedure from 2013 to 2016 were prospectively included. General characteristics, intraoperative variables, postoperative course, and functional outcomes were analyzed. Patients were compared into two groups: group (1) patients undergoing Deloyers procedure without ileostomy, and group (2) Deloyers procedure with protective ileostomy. Results: Sixteen patients undergoing isoperistaltic transposition of the right colon remnant were included, of which 9 (63%) were males with a median age of 47 (range 22-76) years. The main surgical indication was the restoration of bowel transit (62.5%). There was higher major morbidity rate in the Deloyers procedure with protective ileostomy group, but without statistical significance (20% vs. 9%, p = 0.92). No leaks or deaths were reported. The length of hospital stay was 7 days. The mean number of bowel movements per day was 4 at 18 months of follow up. Only four (25%) patients used irregularly loperamide. Conclusions: The Deloyers procedure has satisfactory results and is reproducible with low morbidity. The major and minor morbidity rates were similar between groups, suggesting that the costs and risks of a second procedure can be avoided by providing a safe primary anastomosis.